One of the unexplored ideas (as far as I know) in Clockpunk is the absence of a Clockwork Difference Engine. Given that people in Greece as far back as the first century B.C had the technology to build devices like the Antikythera Mechanism, the possibility of an earlier Difference Engine exists. Imagine a difference engine build by the great master himself – Leonardo’s Difference Engine. I may be writing a short story on it soon, so stay tuned.
Pages
Steampunk Links
Archives
Recent Posts
a
Blog Stats
- 213,467 hits
Recent Comments
| Joseph Francis on Fury – A Clockpunk … | |
| keith newstead on Contact Us | |
| scatterbrain on Anthology Project | |
| Full face helmets on Clockpunk Motorcycle Scul… | |
| Dava on Replica of Al-Jaziri’s E… |
Top Clicks
Top Posts
Knowing and Doing
This site is licensed under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
“I have been impressed with the urgency of doing. Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Being willing is not enough; we must do.” - Leonardo Da Vinci
“I have been impressed with the urgency of doing. Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Being willing is not enough; we must do.” - Leonardo Da Vinci
Bruce Sterling and William Gibson wrote a book called “The Difference Engine” that imagines the machining precision necessary to create large, functional difference engines was available in 1885. It includes all sorts of ways that computing could/would have affected the industrial revolution, the American civil war, English politics and, of course, other technology. 1885 ain’t the first century BC, but it’s a good read.
The Antikythera Device is a great McGuffin, across the board. a bit with that myself, a while back.
sssss: Yeah, actually I had that novel in mind when I did the post about clockpunk difference engine.
Neal Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle talks about Leibniz’s Logic Mill which was a pre-Difference Engine clockwork computer. I don’t know if it was ever actually built. How do the 1660’s fit into the clockpunk theme?
irisclara, Thanks for pointing out Leibniz’s Logic Mill. I will look into it soon. 1660s may be a bit too late given that the Renaissance is usually taken to span from the 14th to the 16th century, plus or minus hundreds years may be acceptable to some extent.